|
Business-Managed Democracy‘Business-managed democracies are those in which the political and cultural
State-based Business Campaigns
Reference: ‘Transforming Education Policy: Assessing 10 Years of Progress in the States’, Business Roundtable, June 1999. (pdf)
The BRT claimed that the state-based campaign taught them that if business speaks with one voice it has more influence; that it is important to forge alliances with state political leaders; that business expertise can be used strategically to improve schools; that public opinion research can be used strategically to stimulate reform; and that as “major employers and community leaders, CEOs are forceful, credible advocates of reform positions and can influence candidates and elected/appointed officials’ views on key education issues”.
Reference: ‘Building Support for Tests That Count’, Washington, DC, The Business Roundtable, November 1998, pp. 5-6. (pdf)
The BRT put out a guide to business people in 1998 about how to build public support for “tests that count”, that is, difficult tests aligned to state-based curriculum standards. It explained that first they had to persuade state policymakers to adopt standardised tests. This might involve surveying candidate commitment to this goal during election years; testifying at hearings; and regularly meeting with legislators to reinforce the business community agenda. National Alliance of Business (NAB) Reference: Edward B. Rust, 'Business Issues in Elementary and Secondary Education', Paper presented at the Committee on Education and the Workforce, US House of Representatives, 1 July 1999.
The BRT was joined by the National Alliance of Business (NAB), and together they formed the Business Coalition for Education Reform (BCER), which coordinated “a network of more than 500 state and local business-led” education coalitions around the nation in the campaign for standardised testing, school-to-career initiatives, business-style management of schools, and the use of school transcripts by employers in hiring. Reference: Catherine Gewertz, ‘Business Group Merges with Education Center’, Education Week, vol 22, no 11, 2002, p. 5; 'Brochure', Paper presented at the The 2002 Business and Education Conference: The New Era of Educcation Reform, New York, 5-6 November, 2002.
The NAB had been formed by Henry Ford II in 1968 with the help of President Lyndon B. Johnson. Its membership included 5000 businesses and by the 1980s its focus was on school ‘reforms’. It managed the state and local business coalitions and convened the Business Coalition for Education Reform (BCER) and the Business Coalition for Excellence in Education (BCEE). The BRT and the NAB played a key role in “developing and expanding” state and local business coalitions. Rust, who as we saw earlier was active in both coalitions, wrote: Reference: Edward B. Rust, 'Business Issues in Elementary and Secondary Education', Paper presented at the Committee on Education and the Workforce, US House of Representatives, 1 July 1999, p. 4.
Reference: 'National Alliance of Business Releases Math and Science Achievement Business Guide', PR Newswire, 20 May 1998
NAB also led a nationwide campaign by business groups, “Making Academics Count” aimed at ensuring that employers, large and small, use student assessment records when they hire workers. This was another way to make sure performance in standardised tests had a consequence for students. PR Campaigns Reference: ‘Building Support for Tests That Count’, Washington, DC, The Business Roundtable, November 1998, pp. 10-11, 13. (pdf)
State-based public relations campaigns were also run. For example, the Maryland Business Roundtable “recruited, organized and trained a 45-member Speakers Bureau “to enable them to spread the message about the value of standards and testing with the help of a video and brochure.” In Washington state MacDonald’s put sample test questions on place mats designed to promote standardised testing. Reference: ‘Building Support for Tests That Count’, Washington, DC, The Business Roundtable, November 1998, p. 11. (pdf)
Companies also targeted their own employees with ‘brown bag lunches’ and talks. Ashlands set up exhibits at two of its Kentucky plants which employees could look at during their breaks. It even set up a classroom on one site, complete with children and teachers from a local school doing their actual school work. Reference: ‘Building Support for Tests That Count’, Washington, DC, The Business Roundtable, November 1998, p. 8. (pdf)
In Washington State, the Partnership for Learning (formed in 1995) underwrote a video and handbook and other materials aimed at firstly persuading “opinion leaders, community movers and shakers, editorial writers, and chambers of commerce”, and then parents, of the value of standardised testing. Funding came from Washington-based businesses such as Boeing, Microsoft, Washington Mutual and Weyerhaeuser. The Partnership also ran public relations workshops for businessmen, PTA leaders, and school district PR managers on how best to express the message when dealing with media, community groups and other audiences. See also: Business Roundtable | No Child Left Behind |
© 2009 Sharon Beder
|