|
Business-Managed Democracy‘Business-managed democracies are those in which the political and cultural
School Choice
Reference: Nico Hirtt, ‘The Three Axes of School Merchandization’, European Educational Research Journal, vol 3, no 2, 2004, p. 442; Ann Morrow, et al., ‘Public Education: From Public Domain to Private Enterprise?’ in Alan Reid (ed) Going Public: Education Policy and Public Education in Australia, Canberra, Australian Curriculum Studies Association (ACSA), 1998, p. 17.
All over the world there has been a shift from mass education, when the aim was to make higher levels of education accessible to broader sections of the population, to the marketisation of education, whereby education is being turned into “a commodity whose price reflects its quality”.
Reference: Quoted in Jaclyn Fierman, ‘Giving Parents a Choice of Schools’, Fortune, 4 December, 1989.
The idea is that schools should compete in a marketplace of schools where parents are the consumers. Business coalitions and the think tanks they fund have consistently argued that Undermining Right to Quality EducationIn some nations, private schools are being included in the competition between schools, despite their superior resources. The idea inherent in private schools – that some parents should be able to buy a better education for their children – fits well with the market ideology behind the push for competition. But it conflicts with the ideal of equal educational opportunity for all children which dominated educational policy in most countries till the 1980s. The ideal was once so deeply entrenched in civilised values that the UN’s International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of 1976) specified that “Primary education shall be compulsory and available free to all” and free secondary education should be progressively introduced.
The right of every child to a high quality education has been replaced by the right of every parent to choose the school their child attends. Hardly an equivalent right given the inequity that results. Reference: Michael Engel, The Struggle for Control of Public Education: Market Ideology Vs Democratic Values, Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 2000, p. 69.
Education, once a public good, has become a private good. The market privileges those children whose parents are wealthier, or better-informed consumers of schooling. Rather than public education being a community enterprise, it “pits families and schools against each other in a battle for survival of the fittest”. Reference: Geoff Whitty, Making Sense of Education Policy: Studies in the Sociology and Politics of Education, London, Sage, 2002, p. 57; Natalie Lacireno-Paquet and Charleen Brantley, ‘Who Chooses Schools, and Why?’ Education Policy Research Unit, Arizona State University and Education and Public Interest Center, Univerity of Colorado, January 2008, p. 5.
In many nations school choice has led to an increased segregation of schools based on socio-economic background or ethnicity. For example a recent US study found parents tend to choose schools on the basis of the race and class composition of the school. Reference: Edward B. Fiske and Helen F. Ladd, ‘A Distant Laboratory’, Education Week, 17 May, 2000; David Hill, ‘Global Neo-Liberalism and the Perversion of Education', in Reclaim Our Education Conference, University of East London, 2000, p. 5.
Various governments have made attempts to prevent schools being so selective in their enrolment but they cannot prevent the variability between schools that a market system inevitably produces. Education as a BusinessThe whole concept of public education as providing equal opportunity to all children is being undermined by business efforts to get schools to behave like businesses, competing for students in an educational marketplace. Reference: Jane Kenway and Lindsay Fitzclarence, ‘Consuming Children? Public Education as a Market Commodity’, in Alan Reid (ed) Going Public: Education Policy and Public Education in Australia, Deakin West, ACT, Australian Curriculum Studies Association and Centre for the Study of Public Education, University of South Australia, 1998, p. 48.
The combination of devolution, accountability, competition and marketisation encourages “schools to see themselves as free standing, entrepreneurial small businesses” and for parents and students to see themselves as consumers of the product that schools offer. (See also section on Schools as Businesses.)
Reference: Sharon Gewirtz, et al., Markets, Choice and Equity in Education, Buckingham, Open University Press, 1995, p. 21; Clara Morgan, ‘A Retrospective Look at Educational Reforms in Ontario’, Our Schools, Our Selves, vol 15, no 2, 2006, p. 134; Larry Kuehn, ‘The New Right Agenda and Teacher Resistance in Canadian Education’, Our Schools, Our Selves, vol 15, no 3, 2006, pp. 137-8.
Various publications have emerged which reaffirm the idea of “educational consumerism”, such as the Good Schools Guide in the UK and several newspaper supplements in Canada and elsewhere that provide consumer guidance to parents choosing schools. In a market, it is inevitable that some businesses will fail, however, it is not acceptable for schools to fail and go bankrupt and be shut down, as it leaves the students attending it high and dry. Unlike businesses, however, Reference: Cathy Wylie, ‘Can Vouchers Deliver Better Education? A Review of the Literature: With Special Reference to New Zealand’, Wellington, New Zealand Council for Educational Research, 1998, pp. 14-15.
Methods for Creating a Market for Schools Reference: Cathy Wylie, ‘Can Vouchers Deliver Better Education? A Review of the Literature: With Special Reference to New Zealand’, Wellington, New Zealand Council for Educational Research, 1998, p. 9.
There are various ways in which education can be turned into a marketable commodity, subject to the “disciplines” and “vagaries” of the market. Schools can be funded on the basis of how many students enrol, with enrolments at each school open to all students, not just those in the immediate neighbourhood. Such an open enrolment system may be limited to public schools, as in England or New Zealand. Alternatively an open enrolment scheme may include private schools, which also receive government funding on the basis of enrolment numbers, as in some parts of Europe and Chile. Another way of encouraging markets in education is to introduce government-funded vouchers. Voucher programs are a way to enable students to take their per-student government funding with them to the school of their choosing, including private schools. They have been promoted heavily by business interests in the US, despite public opposition to them. Reference: PFAW, ‘Unaccountable by Design: Corporate Tuition Tax Credit Schemes Drain Millions from States’, Washington DC, People for the American Way Foundation, September 2003b, p. 1.
Tax credits for tuition fees were designed as an alternative to vouchers that isn’t so obviously dependent on government money. Corporations are able to get income tax credit for the amount they give to nonprofit school funding organizations. In this way instead of paying their tax to the government they give it to a private scholarship fund that provides vouchers to children attending private or religious schools. In effect it is the same as a government funded voucher scheme except that the funds are completely controlled by a private fund and the accountability that would normally be part of a government program is missing. Reference: Susan Eaton, 'The Pull of Magnets', The Nation, 14 June 2010.
Since vouchers are not publicly popular, the advocates of school choice in the US are increasingly turning to charter schools as the means of achieving it. The US Education Department allocated $490 million from its 2011 budget to promoting school choice, most of it for charter schools. Links
See also: Ideology | Open Enrolments | Vouchers | Private Schools
© 2009 Sharon Beder
|