Business-Managed Education
Charter School Performance
In general the teaching standard in charter schools varies enormously. However, studies have failed to show that, on average, charter schools perform significantly better than public schools with similar demographics. In fact some show they perform worse. Researchers have noted that whilst a few charter schools use their freedom from regulation to innovate and hire talented but uncertified teachers, others use it to cut costs and run schools badly: ‘If bonanzas are realized in some places, they are apparently offset by catastrophes in others.’
An Education Department analysis also found that the longer a charter school had been operating, the more test scores declined. Another study by researchers at Western Michigan University found that states where charter schools are mainly run for profit have worse learning outcomes.
Performance of Charter Schools – Some Studies
| Year | Researchers | Scope | Comparison with other Public Schools |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | Rand Corporation for state government | California | No significant difference |
| 2003 | National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) | fourth graders | No measurable difference |
| 2004 | Education Department | fourth graders | Performance worse |
| 2005 | Economic Policy Institute | eleven states and DC | No difference or performance worse |
| 2006 | Western Michigan University researchers | Michigan, Ohio | Performance worse |
| 2006 | National Center for Educational Statistics | National | Performance worse |
| 2007 | Education Policy Research Unit (EPRU), Arizona State University | Six Great Lake states | Performance worse |
| 2009 | CREDO National Charter School Study | National | Performance worse |
| 2011 | National Education Policy Center | New York | No significant difference, fewer English learners |
The 2009 CREDO study by Stanford University, which examined 2400 charter schools in 16 states found wide variation in charter school performance but concluded that on the whole, "students in charter schools not faring as well as students in traditional public schools". 17% of charter schools had significantly better academic gains, 37% had significantly worse gains and 46% were not significantly different to traditional public schools.
In Missouri, most charters schools do not meeting state proficiency standards and the state does not have the power to close even the worst performing of them.
![]() |
"Of the 8,518 Columbus students attending a charter school that had received a state rating for the 2007-2008 academic year, over 79% attended a school ranked D or F." This compares with 34 % of students in the Columbus City Schools (CCS) system. |
Government Advocacy of Charter Schools
Despite the dismal record of charter schools’ performance President Bush tried to facilitate their expansion with the reauthorisation of the NCLB Act by enabling school districts to ignore state caps on the number of charter schools if schools fail to reach Annual Yearly Progress for five years in a row. The Education Department also proposed to offer rural areas online charter schools.
President Barack Obama is also a supporter of charter schools: ‘I doubled the number of charter schools in Illinois despite some reservations from teachers unions. I think it’s important to foster competition inside the public schools.’ He is promoting charter schools with the Race to the Top Fund.
Links
- CREDO National Charter School Study, Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO), Stanford University


