|
Business-Managed Democracy‘Business-managed democracies are those in which the political and cultural
Business Fears
Subversive IdeasIn 1985 Greg Sheridan, a journalist for the Murdoch-owned Australian, wrote a front page article entitled ‘The lies they teach our children’ which was essentially a tirade against the broadening of the school curriculum of the 1960s and 70s and the role that teachers were playing in it. Reference: Greg Sheridan, ‘The Lies They Teach Our Children’, The Australian, 2-3 February, 1985, p. 1.
Reference: Greg Sheridan, ‘The Lies They Teach Our Children’, The Australian, 2-3 February, 1985, pp. 1, 12.
Sheridan criticised the way the curriculum was being set at the school level rather than centrally, the teaching of environmentalism as being anti-capitalism, the teaching of human rights as Leninist, the teaching of social sciences for claiming gross inequality in Australian society, and the teaching of values-clarification rather than Christian ethics. He described values-clarification as discussion groups where students imagine themselves in various situations and consider how they would behave. Sheridan was concerned that “a common result of such activities is to open children to a much more radical rendering of their values and loyalties”. He claimed that the curriculum in general was subversive: Reference: Greg Sheridan, ‘The Lies They Teach Our Children’, The Australian, 2-3 February, 1985, p. 12.
Political Correctness and Lefty Bias Reference: Linda Doherty, ‘Government Staffer Says New-Age Warriors Waging Culture Wars in Class’, Sydney Morning Herald, 3 May, 2004, p. 3.
Such views continue to shape the Australian curriculum. Donnelly, when he was chief of staff to the Minister for Employment in 2004, argued that political correctness, education fads and left-wing ideas had skewed education in Australia so that teachers spent their time advocating homosexuality, multiculturalism and Aboriginal concerns rather than teaching the three Rs. Reference: Lynn Bell, ‘Education Minister Calls for National Curriculum’, ABC Online, 6 October, 2006; AAP, ‘Federal Takeover of Curriculum’, SBS World News Australia, 6 October, 2006
In 2006 the Australian Minister for Education, Julie Bishop, argued that a “back-to-basics uniform national curriculum” was necessary because left wing “ideologues” had “hijacked” the curriculum and school students were subjected to “trendy educational fads”. Reference: Farrah Tomazin, ‘Back to Basics: Studies Scrapped in Curriculum Revamp’, The Age, 24 April, 2007; Mark Davis, ‘Fads, Sludge Eroding Education, PM Says’, Sydney Morning Herald, 9 February, 2007.
In 2007 Australian state education ministers promised to eliminate the subject “Studies of Society and Environment” which had been a key learning area and replace it with “the traditional disciplines of history, geography and economics”. And Prime Minister John Howard labelled school curricula as “politically-correct” with traditional subjects such as English, history and geography being displaced by “incomprehensible sludge”. Breeding Rebellion Reference: Ira Shor, Culture Wars: School and Society in the Conservative Restoration 1969-1984, Boston, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986, pp. 18, 85.
The changing school curricula stirred fears of rebellion and lawlessness, and social disorder amongst some business people and their allies. Business leaders and conservatives disliked the growing activism of school students which seemed to arise from the broadened school curricula. Teachers were accused of being left-wing and “espousing an anti-business, or anti industry stance”. Reference: Ira Shor, Culture Wars: School and Society in the Conservative Restoration 1969-1984, Boston, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986, pp. 89, 14.
From the point of view of business leaders in the US: “Too many people were studying foreign policy, hiring practices, job injuries, pollution and product-safety… Knowledge was out of control… The protest period had brought together too many people who had learned they had a right to criticize the whole system”. Writing in a right-wing conservative magazine, The Public Interest, Heather MacDonald attacked the progressive trends in education: Reference: Heather MacDonald, ‘Why Johnny Can't Write: Teaching Grammar and Logic to College Students’, The Public Interest, 22 June, 1995.
Decline of Youth Reference: Jeffrey R. Henig, Rethinking School Choice: Limits of the Market Metaphor, Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1994, pp. 45-6.
The “unravelling of traditional norms and values” and the perceived rise in teen rowdiness, lewd language and drug use by young people was also blamed on schools and their progressive agenda, which lacked discipline. Similarly employers blamed schools for the poor dress, lack of subservience to supervisors, poor motivation and lack of a work ethic in young employees. See also: Curriculum Content | Core Knowledge | Business-Friendly | Narrowed Curricula
© 2009 Sharon Beder
|