NewsArrowBack

Divider

National Pollution Inventory
Bullet pointPollutant Database Launched
Bullet pointNational Toxics Network Alert
Bullet pointCommunity Right to Know About Pollution 'Gutted'

Pollutant Database Launched

28 January 2000. A new national pollutant database will allow Australians to get a clearer picture of pollutants being discharged into their neighbourhoods.

The Federal Environment Minister, Robert Hill, has launched Australia's first national pollutant inventory in Melbourne. Senator Hill says people can use the Internet to find out what is being put into the atmosphere by factories and other sources and what is being done to reduce emissions.

Senator Hill says Australia has followed the lead of other industrialised countries.

"We did have an advantage in that Australia is not the first in having a national pollutant inventory and so we were able to learn from the experience of countries such as the United States and Canada," he said.

"We were able to refine the lists of substances from their experience so that we were not requiring reporting on unnecessary substances and we want to be obviously as industry-friendly as possible."

The national pollutant inventory can be found at www.environment.gov.au/epg/npi/.


Source: ABC News Online - Bi-daily bulletin mailing list <NEWSMAIL@YOUR.abc.net.au>, 28 January 2000.

back to top...

National Toxics Network Alert

In 1998, after 6 years of consultation and many millions of dollars in consultancies, a National Environment Protection Measure for the National Pollutant Inventory was finally adopted. The NPI is :

  • Basically a voluntary program, variously implemented by 8 jurisdictions.
  • Prohibits fines & penalties to enforce reporting compliance due to "the cooperative nature of the NPI".
  • EXCLUDES:
    1. All chemicals released to public sewers,
    2. All Waste transfered to landfills
    3. Waste transferred to mine tailing dams
    4. All materials/waste sent for recycling/ reprocessing
  • Exclusion of 'transfers' was totally unexpected by NGO s & community groups
  • Means chemicals continue to be dumped without public scrutiny.

By comparing data provided by one company under voluntary Industry Responsible Care Program, estimates that over 50% of pollution will not be reported: eg one company reported ...

  1. Emissions of 1,236,834 kgs of chemical releases to air, water & landfill.
  2. Under NPI, that company to report only approx. 156,434 kilograms.
  3. Bulk of chemicals aren't on the NPI list plus 204,434 kg to landfill

Australia's decisions to drop transfers flies in the face of international commitment to a ŒPollution Release & Transfer Register‚ (PRTR) under Agenda 21. United States & Canada report transfers, Japan & Mexico to include transfers.

  • Few chemicals to be reported in NPI
  • NPI : 36 substances in first 2 years and 90 substances in 2000.
  • US Toxics Release Inventory mandatory reporting of over 600 toxic substances
  • Canada has 246 substances
  • Japan and Mexico propose 178 substances
  • Chemicals omitted include dioxin, ammonia nitrate, zinc, vinyl acetate, diethanolamine, asbestos, styrene, propylene, napthalene etc
  • NPI excludes all Agricultural Chemicals
  • NO information on Storage & Emergency Plans.
Regards Mariann
Mariann Lloyd-Smith
Coordinator, National Toxics Network Inc.

back to top...

Community Right to Know About Pollution 'Gutted'

PRESS RELEASE - 1 March, 1998

The announcement on the National Pollutant Inventory (NPI NEPM), released last Friday (Feb98), has 'gutted' the Australian community's right to know about pollution and continues to protect industry's right to secretly pollute.

"The Australian community has waited for over a decade for the same rights to chemical emissions information as their American and Canadian counterparts, only to be betrayed at the last minute by the recently established and little known, industry mouthpiece, the National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) 1." said Ms Lloyd-Smith, coordinator of National Toxics Network.

"The National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) NPI in its current form will effectively mean that the community will not have a right to information about pollution from much of Australia's industry.

While the original NPI was to include emissions and transfers from a wide variety of polluting industries and activities, the final scheme is a "mickey mouse" version, which will protect industry's right to ongoing secret pollution."

Much fewer industries than originally proposed are required to report, the list of chemicals has been more than halved and much of current pollution will be exempt from reporting and public scrutiny. This will include all toxic and hazardous waste being released into public sewers, dumped into landfills or pumped into tailing dams. By excluding all transfers this will reduce the chemical emissions being reported by a significant quantity. (estimated >50%). Under its Agenda 21 obligations, Australia had agreed to implement a pollutant emissions and transfer register.

If you compare data provided under the Responsible Care Program, one company Australia company reported :

  • Emissions of 1 * million kilograms (1,236834 kg) of chemical releases to air, water & landfill.
  • Under the current NPI the company would report on and the community would be told about 156,434 kilograms only.
  • The NPI list is so small (37 cf to USA TRI approx. 635) that the bulk of the chemicals emitted aren't on the NPI list, plus 204,434 kg goes to landfill. The sort of chemicals you won't find out about are Ammonia Nitrate, Zinc, Vinyl acetate Diethanolamine, asbestos, styrene, propylene, napthalene etc

USEPA credits its release inventory, the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) with 46% pollution reduction (Carol Browning, USEPA '96)

"Other failings of the NPI are its lack of compliance with the NPI NEPM restricting fines for industries who fail to report due to "the cooperative nature of the NPI." Rather compliance will consist of 'naming' in Parliament those industries, which do not report. The lack of any consistency in third party right's to appeal decisions (e.g., commercial in confidence claims to information) or freedom of information provision means that the NPI will not be a national mandatory system rather a piecemeal measure implemented differently in eight different states and territories. "

Late last year, community environment groups walked out of NEPC consultative process for the NPI calling it a "charade" and the NPI, "pathetic and lowest common denominator environmental protection".

NTN believes that both a lack of political commitment plus the 'close working relationship' between NEPC and powerful industry bodies has blinded NEPC to the needs and wishes of much of the Australian public. This failure to adequately address pollution inventorying, monitoring and information provision will eventually lead to increased contamination of the environment.

NTN will be calling on all Australian industry to reject the NPI as 'lowest common denominator" environmental measure and commit themselves as good corporate citizens to the 'community's right to know' or risk being labeled as one of the "The Great Australian Polluters."

CONTACT : M. Lloyd-Smith, Coordinator, National Toxics Network


1. The National Environment Protection Council is made up of State and Federal Ministers and is supported by the NEPC Corporation established in Adelaide. NEPC has failed to consult with the community and for example in the make-up of the eight Technical Working Groups established for the National Environment Protection Measure (NEPM) on Ambient Air, there was a heavy bias toward industry groups , with only one representative from community/environment groups.

Back...

Divider