Environment in Crisis

The Media
The Media

Objectivity
Sources

Framing the News
Style
Bland
Entertainment
Events
Emotion
Personalities
Isolated Incidents

Ownership
Manipulation

Back to Main Menu..

Emotion vs Explanation

The journalistic tendency to balance stories with two opposing views leads to a tendency to "build stories around a confrontation between protagonists and antagonists." (Ricci 1993, p. 95) Issues such as garbage and sewage sludge only get coverage, despite their importance, when there is a fight over the siting of a landfill or incinerator and then the coverage is on the "anger and anguish of affected citizens, or the conflicting claims of corporate spokesmen, government regulators and environmental activists" rather than the issues and technical background to them. A survey commissioned by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers of media coverage in the US in 1991 found that independent experts were seldom used as sources: "The news was not oriented toward describing or explaining the problem, but rather toward disputes over what should be done about it." (Gersh 1992)

In one story by ABC's Nightline, for example, Nebraskan residents opposing a 'low-level' radioactive waste dump in their neighbourhood, attempted to present, with the help of an EPA expert Hugh Kaufman, rational arguments involving discussion of various technical issues. However, according to Kaufman, the TV crew wanted emotional material and in the end used archive footage of heated meetings to get the emotional content they wanted:

They defined the issue this way: The public are a bunch of emotional misfits who think about Chernobyl and aren't doing their homework, while proponents are these brilliant technical experts. In other words they walked in with a predetermined story when, in fact, what they had seen in Nebraska was just the opposite. (Russell 1990, p. 5)

This is a feature of many news stories about local controversies. The intelligence and research of local residents is downplayed and they are presented as passionate, self-interested and inexpert. This tends to discourage wider support for their cause from the viewing public and to disempower other citizens by depriving them of attractive models of political activism.

...back to top


References:

Gersh, Debra, 1992, Covering solid waste issues, Editor & Publisher, Vol. 125, No. August 29.

Ricci, David, 1993, The Transformation of American Politics: The New Washington and the Rise of Think Tanks (New Haven: Yale University Press).

Russell, Dick, 1990, 'EPA Official Accuses Nightline of Distortions', Lies of Our Times, June, p. 5.

 


© 2003 Sharon Beder