|
There is
a lack of knowledge about the impacts of CCA-treated timber in the
Australian environment. Since the timber industry is unlikely to
fund such research, there is a need for independent research. Furthermore,
the research that is being undertaken focuses mostly on alternative
chemicals, although they pose a range of environmental and health
risks as well. It is recommended that non-industry linked research
funding is made available in sufficient amounts to enable researchers
to:
- Investigate
non-biocidal wood treatment alternatives and the performance of
alternative materials;
- Conduct
epidemiological research on the health impacts of CCA exposure
on timber workers, as well as on agricultural animals, such as
horses;
- Carry
out a comprehensive mass testing programme of Australian playgrounds
to determine how much arsenic children are ingesting;
- Undertake
epidemiological studies that are properly extrapolated to the
risks for children, taking into account the different rate of
metabolism for children;
- Measure
the actual amount of arsenic residue on the surface of CCA-treated
timber of different ages, as well as levels of arsenic in the
surrounding soil, and investigate the factors that influence this;
- Investigate
synergistic toxicity of CCA acting as a combination, rather than
extrapolating the risks of each element acting alone;
- Determine
the environmental risk to aquatic environments posed by CCA-treated
timber;
- Understand
the environmental risk associated with the use of CCA-treated
timber in commercial applications, such as farm fencing, poles
and bollards;
- Measure
the level of plant uptake of arsenic in Australia, including through
the roots; and
- Develop
technologies to safely remove arsenic, chromium and copper from
CCA-treated timber prior to landfill or re-use.

|